I know that I am a bit biased because the first sensor didn't work properly (which may have been why the 630G insisted on that calibration exactly 6 hours later the first time - I don't know for sure if it needed a calibration exactly 6 hours later the second time, but I also was super careful to do a calibration as close to 6 hours later as possible to avoid having to do extra blood tests).
Here's a fun (read: annoying) fact: when you are calibrating a sensor, it says "Calibrating" across the sensor graph on the main screen...and also the other sensor graphs unless you actually start looking over them.
![]() |
| Here's the main 630G pump screen. |
![]() |
| And here's when I specifically selected the sensor graph. |
Through the entire life of the sensor, I found that my sensor glucose was consistently about 0.5-1.5 mmol/L off all of my blood sugar readings. This has never been the case with the VEO, especially after the first day or two of running a sensor (it always gets super accurate from about that point for me). So this was pretty disappointing because I had heard that this transmitter was supposed to be more accurate. And I actually found myself not caring what the sensor was telling me because it wasn't overly accurate anyway - it was at the point that I was counting down the days to it being over because I hated dealing with.
Oh, and when I finally got to pull the sensor out, it looked perfectly fine. So I don't know what it's problem was for the entire six days.
As you may have guessed, I ended up turning pretty much all of the fancy alerts off. I had already turned the low suspend off thanks to the failed sensor. But it was also annoying on the other end, being told I was going high/was high when I knew I wasn't (and confirmed it with a blood test).
Needless to say, I would not be trusting these sensors/this transmitter with a closed loop system. I don't trust my VEO with it, but it's a heck of a lot more accurate than the 630G was for me.


No comments:
Post a Comment